Text parafrazat despre " In the scientific literature, different views on what is meant by adventure tourism exist. Just re..."
Mai jos găsești 4 variante diferite de exprimare pentru același text, fiecare cu stilul său distinct.
Textul Original
In the scientific literature, different views on what is meant by adventure tourism exist. Just recently Rantala and Rokenses (2018) asked the question whether adventure tourism is a coherent concept and suggested a reconceptualization. Adventure tourism is so far no analytical concept but rather a category examined by researchers from different backgrounds. The term itself is not uniformly used– the terms extreme, trend, active or outdoor tourism are also used– and an adventure for one person is not necessarily perceived as an adventure by another person (ATTA, 2010). A widely used definition (in particular in practice) is: “Adventure travel may be any tourist activity including two of the following three components: a physical activity, a cultural exchange or interaction, and engagement with nature.” (ATTA, 2010, p. 2) A theme that can be found in most definitions is that of risk and uncertainty (Ewert, 1989; Rantala and Rokenses, 2018). Yet risk is subjective and down to previous experiences. It is perceived differently in different situations and the risk perception is influenced by personality, lifestyle and level of skill and experience. Driving a car can be more dangerous than climbing in a high ropes garden, but it is not considered a big risk or an adventure by most people. An experienced climber will consider risk differently than a novice climber (Pomfret, 2012). Adventure tourism should be
Varianta Standard
In the academic literature, there are various interpretations of what adventure tourism entails. Recently, Rantala and Rokenses (2018) posed the question of whether adventure tourism constitutes a coherent concept and proposed a redefinition. Currently, adventure tourism is not an analytical concept but rather a category explored by researchers from diverse fields. The terminology itself is not consistent—terms like extreme, trend, active, or outdoor tourism are also utilized—and what one individual considers an adventure may not be viewed as such by another (ATTA, 2010). A commonly referenced definition, particularly in practical contexts, states: “Adventure travel may be any tourist activity including two of the following three components: a physical activity, a cultural exchange or interaction, and engagement with nature” (ATTA, 2010, p. 2). A recurring theme in most definitions is the aspect of risk and uncertainty (Ewert, 1989; Rantala and Rokenses, 2018). However, risk is subjective and influenced by past experiences. It is perceived differently in various contexts, and this perception is shaped by personality, lifestyle, and levels of skill and experience. For example, driving a car might be seen as more hazardous than climbing in a high ropes course, yet most people do not regard it as a significant risk or an adventure. An experienced climber will assess risk in a different manner than a beginner climber (Pomfret, 2012). Adventure tourism should be